⚠️ WikiLeaks are now on TELEGRAM! ⚠️

They will be exposing some big names in World's history, also some devastating information kept secretly from the public. Together we stand united.

JOIN👉 WikiLeaksOrganisation 

Politics

Pollster Rasmussen Chimes in With Brand New Theory On Why Deep State Raided Trump

Share

News about the FBI raid is flying fast and furious right now. I can tell you that we now can confirm that this was a massive “fishing expedition.” Merrick Garland lied when he said it was a “limited scope” operation.

In fact, look at this tweet from The Federalist editor-in-chief Sean Davis: “Under “Attachment B” of the FBI raid document, Garland demanded the seizure of literally any record Trump ever saw, read, or created over the entire 4-year term of his presidency: “Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021.”

Here’s what attorney and Trump loyalist Jeff Clark has to say about this shameful politicized warrant:

“This part of Att. B of warrant against Trump looks like the kind of GENERAL WARRANT the Framers abhorred and sought to ban in the Fourth Amendment: “c. Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021.”

3/3 The political nature of raid clear because they waited to search for what they knew was ALREADY THERE until just before the Midterms. Some search.

Can you say FISHING EXPEDITION? Also, warrant is undermined by its timing. Since fed officers had been to Mar-a-Lago to inspect the documents there, they already knew there were presid. documents there, and have for mos.

This is quite literally the world’s biggest fishing expedition on record. It’s like, “show me a man, and I’ll find a crime” type situation. It’s unreal. And everyone is going back and forth over what they think could be going on… but the bottom line is that we know the Swamp always protects itself… and in this case, pollster Rasmussen says this move will help Hillary, a lot.

That’s right, HILLARY. All roads always lead back to Hillary.

Here’s exactly what Rasmussen said: “Donald J. Trump v Hillary R. Clinton, et al may have now become a lot tougher case to win for plaintiff Trump – who declassified key evidence of corruption by Clinton when he was The President of the United States – and then just had that evidence confiscated by – The Swamp …”

One of our favorite political bloggers, Sundance, from the Conservative Treehouse agrees, so that’s good enough for me.


Share
Back to top button