Megyn Kelly Obliterates Pete Hegseth

The fake news has been all over Pete Hegseth this week regarding a sexual assault allegation from 2017 that was previously investigated and dropped by the Monterey Police Department.

There was a reason charges were never filed. And the legacy media knows this.  They are pushing this slanderous attack against Pete Hegseth anyway because they really, really care about powerful men abusing innocent women and children… except, of course, if those powerful men include serial abusers like Bill Clinton or gropers like Joe Biden.

The media rushed to humiliate and slander President Trump’s nominee for Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, this week with leaks about a years-old sexual assault allegation that was already investigated by police.

In 2017, Monterey, California, police investigated an allegation made by a married woman [Jane Doe] who claimed Pete Hegseth sexually assaulted her at a political event, but they found no evidence to support her claims. Hegseth claimed the encounter was consensual.

Video footage appears to show a consensual encounter. Video footage also appears to show that it was Hegseth and not the accuser who was slightly intoxicated while the accuser did not appear impaired at all from video footage.

The accuser’s story also fell apart when she refused to answer her husband’s phone calls that night and then discussed an alabi with Hegseth before she went back to the hotel room where her husband was waiting for her. The woman told her husband the same story that she discussed with Hegseth before she left him.

Pete Hegseth’s attorney Timothy Parlatore told Vanity Fair last week: “This allegation was already investigated by the Monterey police department and they found no evidence for it.”

On Friday, reporter and attorney Megyn Kelly discussed the numerous reasons she believes charges were never filed against Pete Hegseth.

Kelly obliterated the accuser.  This was a textbook takedown.

Megyn Kelly included several facts that have been conveniently ignored by the mainstream media as they continue their efforts to destroy Pete Hegseth’s good name and character.

Here is a partial transcript from the Megyn Kelly investigation:

Here’s Blank telling the cops that at 2:00 AM, he left the room and went to look for her. Went down to Knuckles’s. No one was there. At approximately 4:00 AM, Jane Doe arrived at their hotel room. This is per the husband, we assume, to the cops. Accessed their room on her own and used the key card reader to get in. Jane Doe told Blank that she must, quote, Must have fallen asleep. Jane Doe was apologetic. Blank notes that Jane Doe did not have a hard time walking and was not slurring her words. That’s it right there, folks. That’s why they did not bring charges. This is the husband. The cops are looking at text messages of the husband saying to her, You’re never out this late. It’s 2:00 AM. Then the text message cuts off, and he says, Where are you? Are you okay? Are you okay? No response. She was seen going to Pete Hegseth’s room at 1:30. By 2:00, she’s there. The communication with the husband clearly ends while she’s in Pete’s room. She doesn’t respond to any of those texts. He gets up and looks for her, and within two hours, she’s home…

…At 1:30 on the tape, she doesn’t look intoxicated. In the bar, she doesn’t look intoxicated. Here we are at 4:00 AM with a husband saying she does not look intoxicated. She did not a hard time walking. She was not slurring her words. She apologized. And what was the story she told? That she must have fallen asleep. The very same story that Pete Hegseth says she told him she would tell the husband. Pete Hegseth and the husband are not talking. They are not coordinating stories. The cop spoke to Pete independently, and Pete said it was consensual, and she was panicked. She had cheated on her husband and was going to tell him this lie. They’re simultaneously talking to the husband who says she She came in, she didn’t look drunk. That’s my interpretation of him saying, didn’t have a hard time walking, was not slurring, and tells him she must have fallen asleep. The very same lie that she told Pete, she would tell. That’s it. I’m sorry. This woman was not raped. This is a bullshit accusation. On Wednesday, 10:11, Jane Doe told Blank that she was sexually assaulted. Jane Doe did not tell I’ll blank many details…

…By Wednesday or Thursday, at least, she’s got some issue going on down south in Rio that later gets diagnosed as BV, which you can get when you have sex with a new partner, says the nurse. And on Wednesday, the day before she goes to the exam, and by the way, on Monday, they had all come back to her. Remember, she had sex with her husband, and it came back to her. What happened? But it wasn’t until Wednesday that she tells Blank, who we think is the husband, that she was sexually assaulted, did not tell Blank many details. I’ll bet. This is the cop. On 10:18, that’s Thursday now, I spoke with Jane Doe via telephone. She told me that she had additional info. Jane Doe stated she remembered asking Hegseth if he had a condom when the incident occurred. Jane Doe stated she has been suffering from nightmares and memory loss since the incident…

…Oh, this is another huge piece of this that I haven’t seen anywhere in the media. This is important. Meant to mention this up top. On 10-20, which would have been Saturday (a week later), I contacted Jane Doe via telephone. I asked her if she was willing to participate in a pretext phone call that involved Hegseth. Jane Doe stated she did not want to participate and stated it would be too hard for her to talk to Hegseth.

Jane Doe began to cry while on the phone. Okay. They are asking her if she will call him up and say, Pete, what happened between us? I’m having bad memories. You raped me. I said no, a lot. You blocked the door when I tried to leave. You bruised my thigh. (I haven’t seen that anywhere in here, by the way. I have not seen that in this police report.)

That’s what they’re asking her to do. Get it on tape. There’s some inconsistencies in your story, and PS, his story lines up with that of your husband’s. Could you call him? And we’ll tape it, and that’ll be great evidence.

And she says, No. Now, it is possible that a sexual assault or rape victim would not want to call this Fox News star who had allegedly raped her. It is also very possible that she was not raped, and she knew exactly what she’d get if she tried to pull that with him on the phone, and that he would respond with a battery of facts of what actually happened, and that you could hear, potentially, that he was a truth teller because a cop listening to both sides of that conversation would know.