Politics

J6 Committee BURIED Evidence That Contradicts LIE Told By Former White House Aide

Share

One of the popular accusations from January 6 that the left likes to trot out occasionally is how Trump allegedly “lunged” at the steering wheel of his Secret Service vehicle when he was informed he couldn’t visit the capitol.

A former White House Aide, Cassidy Hutchinson, testified in court that this allegation was true.

But it wasn’t, and she’s been caught in her lie.

The driver in question testified to the J6 committee that the incident never occurred.

Unsurprisingly, the committee buried this information to further their narrative.

The testimony from the former White House aide has people seeing a similarity with another fairly recent perjury case.

The J6 committee has been a fraud since day one.

Now that the truth is out there, Trump supporters are calling for legal action against the former aide.

The Washington Examiner has more on this latest development:

House Republicans released their initial report on Monday on their investigation into the Democratic-led select committee on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, the latest step in the House GOP’s look into the riots at the U.S. Capitol following the 2020 election.

Among the findings in the House Administration Committee’s oversight subcommittee report were claims that Cassidy Hutchinson’s account of former President Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6 was not corroborated by other White House employees.

Hutchinson, who was the assistant to former chief of staff Mark Meadows during the Trump administration, was one of the key witnesses in the Democrats’ investigation into Jan. 6. Republicans have long sought to discredit Hutchinson and the overall findings of the select committee, challenging the committee’s work since the GOP took the House majority in 2022.

In the report, the oversight subcommittee, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), said the White House provided Loudermilk with four “heavily redacted” transcribed interviews from White House employees. Upon reviewing them unredacted, the committee found the employees’ descriptions of events “did not corroborate Hutchinson’s.”


Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button