Are the cackles over? WAPO is Getting Really Worried…
Have we heard the last cackle from Kamala? I still remember back in 2020, when this entire Biden farce first started, and everyone thought Kamala was the “real president.”
She was the person Obama really wanted to carry on his third-term legacy, and Joe would be quickly pushed out to make way for Kamala. The “Swap” plot was on…boy, were we wrong. But in our defense, we didn’t realize how insanely stupid and incapable Kamala was back then. And now, years into this mess, it’s very clear that Democrats want to distance themselves as far away from Kamala as humanly possible, and this is really starting to worry the communists over at WAPO.
PJ Media reported that the WaPo article opens with one Jacquelyn Bettadapur, who is presented as a Democrat mover and shaker in Georgia and who is “worried about the political prospects of the woman positioned to be President Biden’s heir — Vice President Harris.” But the real problem is (you guessed it!) those evil, unscrupulous, heartless Republicans who are always so ready, in the Left’s mythology, to “pounce” on the honest mistakes of every patriotic, hard-working, selfless, well-meaning Democrat: “People are poised to pounce on anything,” complains Bettadapur. “Any misstep, any gaffe, anything she says — and so she’s probably not getting the benefit of the doubt.”
Yeah, that’s Kamala Harris’ problem. Folks just aren’t giving her the benefit of the doubt. And the unfavorable coverage from the relentlessly Republican mainstream media doesn’t help. Democrats, Bettadapur continued, “don’t know enough about what she’s doing.” After laying it on that thick, the Post does give us one small hint that Harris’ problems may — just may – be self-inflicted. Bettadapur says: “It doesn’t help that she’s not adept as a communicator.” The Post softened this a bit by adding “that” in brackets before “adept,” but let’s have it straight. Bettadapur’s unedited words are more accurate: Harris is not adept as a communicator.
In fact, it’s even worse than that. In her two years as vice president, Harris has made it abundantly clear that she simply isn’t very bright. If you’re unconvinced of this, check out Harris expatiating upon the passage of time, or informing us that prices have gone up. Recall that in November 2021, Harris interrupted a NASA presenter who was discussing “climate adaptation strategies” to ask, “Can you, can you measure, um, trees?” By way of explanation, she plowed on: “‘Cause part of that data that you are referring to, and it’s in EJ, environmental justice — that you can also track by race their averages in terms of the number of trees in the neighborhood where people live.”
[…]
People are only concerned about her manifest incompetence because of racism and sexism. But now the Washington Post has made skepticism about Harris mainstream on the Left. It invoked Democrat strategists saying that “Harris’s tenure has been underwhelming,” noting that it has been “marked by struggles as a communicator and at times near-invisibility, leaving many rank-and-file Democrats unpersuaded that she has the force, charisma and skill to mount a winning presidential campaign.”
To be sure, the Post hasn’t picked up on the signals from its fellow propagandists at the Times, and so it’s still touting Biden for 2024: “If he seeks reelection as expected, she would be a central part of the campaign, making it a high-stakes dress rehearsal for her own potential bid in 2028.” On the other hand, “if Biden steps aside, she would instantly move to center stage as his potential successor, facing the heightened attacks and scrutiny that accompany such a role.”
Kamala’s insecurity is on stage, front and center, and everyone can see and HEAR it…
Watch:
Kamala is Kamala’s worst enemy. I am convinced at this point, that Joe Biden picked her as “insurance” against impeachment – because no matter how liquified his brains get, he’s still smarter than Kamala Harris.
And THAT will be her “legacy.”
Not much to cackle about, right?
