US

Epstein Files — Part 3 — Featuring Hillary Clinton!

Share

Well, that makes it official: all members of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton family have now been named in the Epstein documents, although I should mention right off the bat that this does not necessarily imply any guilt or wrong-doing.

Even President Trump’s name has appeared in the documents but with no connection to any wrong doing.

Bill on the other hand has been included with the allegation that he “likes them young”.

Charming, Bill….

Ok, let’s jump right in to Part Three, which by the way brings us to about ONE THIRD of the total documents still coming.

In other words, we’ve got a lot more to go!

Let’s start here with TechnoFog breaking down the Hillary connection:

I can already hear Hillary now: “at this point, what difference does it make?”

A lot Hillary, it makes a lot of difference and we are not letting this go!

Fox News reports:

The new release includes a deposition of Tony Figueroa, a driver for Epstein and Maxwell and former boyfriend of Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who claimed that he was often tasked with driving girls to the mansion who looked like they were 16 or 17 years old. Each time he dropped them off, he said, Epstein would pay him $200 each.

He also alleged that Epstein, Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell would “all go out to clubs to pick up girls and try to find them to bring back for Jeffrey.”

Another document containing images of Epstein’s phone records showed an unnamed female left a message that “she is wondering if 2:30 is OK cuz she needs to stay in school.”

And this next part gets a little graphic, so VIEWER WARNING!

Also from Fox News:

Two depositions, one from Figueroa and on of Epstein accuser Johanna Sjoberg, asserted that the trafficker required “so many massages “from so many different girls” because “he needed to have three orgasms a day.”

“It was biological, like eating,” Sjoberg testified.

The latest documents include the names of Jes Staley, a former JPMorgan Chase banker who resigned over his ties to Epstein, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was not accused of wrongdoing but was mentioned as part of a discovery request as an Epstein accuser hoped to gain information from people in his orbit.

The documents were previously sealed or redacted in a 2015 lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, who is currently serving time in federal prison for sex trafficking.

Documents unsealed Thursday also showed a discovery request for all photos of Maxwell taken during Chelsea Clinton’s wedding.

The entire Clinton Family has now been named:

The entire former first family has now been named in the records, although none of the Clintons have been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. A spokesman for the former president earlier this week denied claims in the documents that Epstein and Clinton were close friends.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ordered the documents’ unsealing in December but gave each of the John and Jane Does two weeks to appeal. Lawyers for Giuffre posted the first 40 unsealed files Wednesday. They posted another 19 Thursday and are expected to release 240 files total by Monday.

If you missed Parts 1 and 2, keep reading for a recap:

Epstein Documents — Part Two!

When the unsealed Epstein List and supporting 900+ pages of documents first dropped earlier this week, we didn’t initially realize that was not the full batch.

No, far from it.

We soon came to learn that was just Part 1 of 5-10x more documents that would be coming.

And now I bring you the summary and highlights (or would that be LOW lights?) of the documents just released from Part Two….

As with the first batch, MeetKevin did a fantastic job of summarizing all the main points in a short 20 minute video.

Start here:

And from his eHack website, if you’re rather read the CliffsNotes version, I have that for you too:

Epstein Files Part 2: 01/04/2024 17:23-18:00 PT.

✅ Mark Epstein [Jeffrey Epstein’s brother] spoke with Tucker Carlson and expressed suspicion that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.
😇 We question how sincerely Mark Epstein was involved or knowledgeable of Jeffrey Epstein. Mark says he did not speak with Jeffrey after Jeffrey went to jail. This implies a level of distance between the two. Is Mark someone who’s been an avid watcher of this case, excited to do a show with Tucker, rather than someone who truly has insight? We don’t know.
✅ Mark’s interview refers to multiple third-party accounts. 1) suggesting a lack of pooled blood in the lower portions of Jeffrey’s body, implying he couldn’t have been hanging that long 2) “it’s a scary thought that you could be killed in prison by the government.” 3) 3 fractures in Jeffrey’s neck are quite rare for “soft hangings.” 4) “It’s obvious someone killed him.”
✅ Mark says: “I had not seen Jeff for 7 years prior to his death.” “We lived separate lives.”
✅ Page 97: “Epstein’s purposes in ‘lending’ Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information.”
✅ Page 75: “it does concern me what they could want to write about me considering that B. Clinton walked into VF and threatened them not to write sex-trafficking articles about his good friend J.E.” (Vanity Fair)


Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button